Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lorenzo Carboni vs Nerman Fatic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Carboni vs Fatic analysis and find out who is favored!
Lorenzo Carboni vs Nerman Fatic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Carboni 1 - 0 Fatic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carboni has won 48.19% of points on their second serve, while Fatic has won 49.26%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carboni, in recent form, has won 54.51% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fatic has won 45.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.39% and 32.35% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Carboni has saved 46.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fatic has saved 60.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Carboni has won 48.98% of matches played (W/L 24/ 25), with Fatic winning 52.94% (W/L 36/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Carboni has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 19/ 11), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 283/ 194), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Carboni has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.49% of matches (W/L 23/ 20), where as Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.11% of matches (W/L 23/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Carboni winning 1 times and Fatic being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Carboni winning 2 and Fatic winning 0. The last match between Carboni and Fatic was at the Como Challenger, 29-08-2023, First, Clay with Lorenzo Carboni getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:41.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Carboni and Fatic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Carboni winning 0 times and Fatic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Carboni winning 0, and Fatic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carboni has played against opponents with an average rank of 216.16 while Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 282.72.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carboni has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fatic has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Carboni has converted 37.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fatic has converted 38.17% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
714
Rank
682
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
198
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
55% (40-33)
Career Total W/L
57% (343-257)
32% (6-13)
YTD W/L
42% (10-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$73,995
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Lorenzo Carboni | Nerman Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:41 | 1:33:41 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (33/53) | 55% (35/64) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 52% (17/33) | 57% (20/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (12/20) | 28% (8/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 56% (36/64) | 45% (24/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Lorenzo Carboni
Player
Nerman Fatic
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
52%
(
17 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lorenzo Carboni | Nerman Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 32% (6/13) | 42% (10/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 37% (16/27) | 45% (25/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (188/216) | 48% (249/272) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 18% (2/9) | 35% (6/11) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.39 |
| Aces Total | 15 | 98 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 58 | 47 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:32 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 221.84 | 305.58 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (774/1270) | 64% (981/1521) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (464/774) | 69% (673/981) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (239/496) | 49% (266/540) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (65/175) | 38% (50/131) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (593/1406) | 37% (575/1563) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 41% (7/10) |
| Futures W/L | 35% (6/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (6/18) | 41% (9/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/4) | 50% (4/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 29% (2/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (9/6) | 75% (12/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (9/3) | 25% (12/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (10/0) | 8% (12/1) |
Lorenzo Carboni Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF | 7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| QF | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 0-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
21%
(
3 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Florent Bax
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
60%
(
61 of
101)
1st Serve %
57%
(
70 of
123)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
36 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
52 of
123)
117
Total Points Won
107
|
5-7 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
22%
(
2 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Carboni
Player
Lorenzo Sciahbasi
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Nerman Fatic
77%
(
72 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Adrian Andreev
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve %
38%
(
8 of
21)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
29
Total Points Won
13
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Adrian Andreev
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Aziz Dougaz
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Timofey Skatov
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Nerman Fatic
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nerman Fatic
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Carboni Vs Fatic Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Carboni are available here and Fatic photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Lorenzo Carboni
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nerman Fatic
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
